About LandmarkHunter.com


Landmarkhunter.com was founded and run by James Baughn until he passed away in December 2020. The website is now maintained by the Historic Bridge Foundation. Please scroll down to "What's the purpose of this site?" to see an introduction to the website written by James Baughn.

Contact Us: Questions, Concerns, and New Users

Landmarkhunter.com does not maintain an email account. If you have a question about a bridge or the website, please visit the forum on the website and post your question. A user account is not required. The many contributors and users on Landmarkhunter.com will address your question. If you wish to request a user account so you can contribute photos and information to Landmarkhunter.com, please fill out the New User Registration Form, and post a comment in the forum introducing yourself to the friendly Landmarkhunter.com community, and requesting activation of your account, using the email address you chose when filling out the registration. An administrator will respond to your request and activate your account.

Other general concerns about Landmarkhunter.com may be addressed to the Historic Bridge Foundation directly, however please note that the Historic Bridge Foundation is unable to respond to questions about individual structures on Landmarkhunter.com. Please make use of the forums for any discussions or questions relating to individual bridges.

Legal Information

Landmarkhunter.com is not a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it a hired consultant for any government agency, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency.

Like Wikipedia, Landmarkhunter.com is composed of user-edited and contributed content. Landmarkhunter.com offers no guarantee as to the accuracy to information offered as fact on Landmarkhunter.com, and will not be held responsible for any consequences resulting from the use of such information. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Those making use of information from Landmarkhunter.com have the responsibility of confirming and verifying its accuracy. Landmarkhunter.com also offers numerous opinions and commentary on the website, and these opinions are the opinions of the respective Landmarkhunter.com member (or member of the public) who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else.

Government agencies and other owners of structures have the responsibility to understand the legal status of Landmarkhunter.com and its members. Landmarkhunter.com content is not and may not be used in place of official content, correspondence, and communications of governments and any government agency or organization. Landmarkhunter.com is not responsible for any consequences resulting from the use or misuse of Landmarkhunter.com content, correspondence, and communications in this manner. Owners and users of landmarks have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of the circumstances.

Landmarkhunter.com and all its content is by default copyright and should be considered "All Rights Reserved." This includes, but is not limited to, the many photos appearing on Landmarkhunter.com. Some content on Landmarkhunter.com is old enough so as to be out of copyright and in the public domain. Some content may also be licenced through a Creative Commons license, which allows for reuse under specific conditions. This content may be mixed in with Landmarkhunter.com copyrighted content, and users have the responsibility of discerning between content under copyright and out of copyright, and any content licensed under Creative Commons. For the convenience of website users, Landmarkhunter.com has attempted to provide citation for many of these out-of-copyright resources, however Landmarkhunter.com makes no guarantee of the accuracy of these citations and assumes no responsibility for these citations. Landmarkhunter.com reserves the right to take any and all appropriate legal action to protect its content. You as the website visitor and/or user have the responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies.

Landmarkhunter.com includes many photographs and images from outside contributors. Photographers who submit photos to Landmarkhunter.com for display on the website give Landmarkhunter.com permanent and irrevocable permission to display the photo(s) on Landmarkhunter.com. By default, Landmarkhunter.com will consider photos provided to Landmarkhunter.com to be the property of the photographer, and all rights to the photo will be retained by the photographer, with the exception that the terms and permission to display the photo on Landmarkhunter.com may not be revoked. Anyone wishing to use copyrighted photos on Landmarkhunter.com that were taken by an outside contributor must contact the third party photographer for permission to make use of the photo. By default and unless otherwise noted, any third party photos are and should be assumed to be copyrighted and "All Rights Reserved."

If you are the owner of a copyrighted photo that has been posted to Landmarkhunter.com without permission by one of our users, please either post a comment in the forum for the landmark page in question, or contact the Historic Bridge Foundation and the images in question will be removed.

Landmarkhunter.com is intended to be a resource and community accessible and appropriate to people of all ages. It is expected that all users of the website will be respectful and courteous. The Historic Bridge Foundation reserves the right to remove any inappropriate content posted to the website that does not meet this expectation.

What's the purpose of this site? By James Baughn, Founder

This website is a companion to Bridgehunter.com, focusing on historic or notable landmarks of all kinds. While looking for historic bridges over the last decade, I've seen many interesting places. All too often, I didn't bother to stop and take photos, only to return a few years later and discover that the landmark had been obliterated by the march of "progress" to make room for a parking lot.

I've left the definition of "landmark" somewhat vague. Basically, a landmark is a place that is "interesting" in some way, distinguished by its history, uniqueness, conspicuousness, notoriety, or beauty. The bar is not particularly high -- certainly not as high as the National Register of Historic Places. However, I don't want this site to turn into Waymarking.com with many trivial categories like "Starbucks Locations" and "Coin Operated Self Service Car Washes."


To kick off the site, I imported almost all listings from the National Register of Historic Places as well as some of the more notable items from the GNIS placenames database maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey. The listings fall into these general departments adapted from NRHP and GNIS terminology:

  • Buildings: Structures intended to shelter some sort of human activity. These are usually private houses (by far the largest category on the NRHP), but also churches, schools, factories, theaters, hospitals, etc.

  • Structures: Man-made construction intended for a function other than sheltering human activity. This is a fairly wide open definition ranging including such things as fire towers, bridges, military fortifications, dams, ships, aircraft, power plants, "world's largest something or other" roadside attractions, and more.

  • Objects: Relatively small-scale things. Includes monuments, works of art, and signs.

  • Site: Catch-all for historic places that don't include any of the above. This is typically the location of a major historical event, but where little remains (except, perhaps, for historic markers). Also includes the locations of ruined buildings and structures, as well as archaeological sites.

  • District: These are National Register "historic districts" where multiple properties in close proximity are grouped together. This is somewhat of a gray area because districts often have individual properties that stand out as landmarks on their own. Listing all of these separately, however, might be impractical.

  • Natural feature: Scenic attraction, often the centerpiece of a park or conservation area. Includes waterfalls, natural arches, scenic overlooks, prominent mountains, and rock formations.

  • Placename: Named location shown on maps, typically the location of a "populated place" (town or settlement), but could also be the name for a point on a railroad line (switch, flagstop, junction, etc.). These placenames usually have a story behind them and will linger on maps long after the original purpose has ended.

On each county listing page, you have the option of hiding and showing the different departments to make it easier to browse the landmarks.


The departments above are further divided into categories. Each landmark fits into exactly one category, such as Lighthouse or Hotel. The National Register doesn't have very specific categories, so I had to cheat a little when importing the data, resorting to generic catch-all categories like Building or Miscellaneous. Go to the main Categories page to browse the differnt choices.


To provide more flexibility than categories, each landmark can be "tagged" with many different keywords and topics. The Browse menu shows the range of tags, including:

  • Architectural styles - These were taken from National Register terminology, but more can be added.
  • Builders - Engineers, architects, and contractors involved with design, construction, and renovations of the landmark
  • People - Famous (or perhaps not-so-famous) people associated with the landmark.
  • Owners - Federal, state or local agency that currently maintains the landmark, if it isn't privately owned
  • Cities - Municipalities where the landmark is located
  • Year - Year, decade, and century when the landmark was built
  • NR groups - Names of "Multiple Property Submissions" from the National Register in which the properties share a common theme (these are different from Historic Districts in that the properies are individually listed and don't need to be in close proximity)
  • Other - Wide-open assortment of tags. These can be easily added by users with editor's accounts.


The site is generally laid out by state, then by county, and finally by individual landmarks. Counties make for a reasonably good method of grouping landmarks together. (Landmarks are also tagged by city, but that leaves out many rural landmarks, plus the boundaries of cities are constantly changing.)

Unfortunately, the rules for what is considered a "county" can vary by state, with lots of oddities. Here is a quick rundown of the exceptions:

  • Louisiana: Parishes
  • Alaska: Boroughs and "Census Areas"
  • Missouri: Independent city of St. Louis is separate from St. Louis County
  • Maryland: Independent city of Baltimore is separate from Baltimore County
  • Nevada: Carson City is separate from surrounding counties
  • Virginia: A large collection of independent cities are separate from surrounding counties
  • New York: The five boroughs of New York City are considered counties (but some of the county names are different than the borough names)
  • District of Columbia: For convenience, the city of Washington is treated as a county

Disclaimer: While county boundaries are usually permanent, some changes have happened in recent decades (especially in Virginia with its frustrating system of independent cities). Since the documention from the National Register is rarely updated beyond the initial nomination, some listings on this site may be shown in the wrong county.